How to run a team retrospective as Small IT and ITOps Teams
Your two-person IT team runs retrospectives — when you run them at all — in a shared Notion doc that nobody updates before the meeting, a Jira board nobody exported, and a Slack thread from three weeks ago that nobody can find. You spend the first 20 minutes reconstructing what actually happened last sprint: which incidents fired, which tickets slipped, which onboarding tasks got dropped. Action items get typed into the Notion doc, assigned to nobody, and forgotten by Tuesday. The next retro starts the same way. With 300 users depending on you, the retro is the one hour you have to actually improve the system — and it keeps getting wasted on archaeology.
What you'll set up
Apps, data, and prompts
The combination of Starch apps, the data sources they pull from, and the prompts you use to drive them.
Connect Jira and PagerDuty from Starch's integration catalog — the agent queries both live when building the pre-retro summary. Starch syncs your AWS data on a schedule via the AWS integration, so cost anomalies from the sprint are available without a manual export. Notion connects from Starch's integration catalog for reading existing runbooks and historical retro notes. Google Calendar connects from Starch's integration catalog so Meeting Notes knows when the retro is scheduled and can pre-load context before the call starts.
Step-by-step
See this running on Starch
Connect your tools, describe what you want, and the agent builds it. Closed beta is free.
April 15, 2026 Sprint Retro — IT Ops
| Jira tickets closed (sprint) | 34 |
| Tickets reopened or missed SLA | 6 |
| PagerDuty incidents fired | 3 |
| AWS cost anomaly flagged ($) | 1,840 |
| Action items extracted from retro transcript | 8 |
| Action items assigned with due dates (auto) | 8 |
| Minutes spent on pre-retro archaeology | 0 |
Before the April 15 retro, Marcus (the senior IT engineer) ran the pre-retro prompt in Starch. It pulled 34 closed Jira tickets from the April 1–15 window, flagged 6 that were reopened or missed their 48-hour SLA, surfaced 3 PagerDuty incidents (two P2s related to Okta SSO timeouts, one P3 for a Jamf MDM enrollment failure), and showed a $1,840 AWS cost spike in CloudWatch tied to a misconfigured Lambda. This summary was in Notion before the meeting started — his teammate Priya had already added a note about the Lambda issue. The retro ran for 45 minutes. Meeting Notes transcribed the whole thing. At the end, Starch extracted 8 action items: Priya owns the Lambda config fix by April 22, Marcus owns following up on the 6 SLA misses with a root cause doc by April 20, and both are tagged on drafting a new Okta SSO runbook by end of month. All 8 became tracked tasks in Project Management automatically. The retro summary was saved to Knowledge Management tagged 'Okta SSO', 'AWS cost', 'SLA misses' — and Starch flagged that Okta SSO issues had appeared in two of the last three retros, which Marcus used to build the case for a dedicated Okta audit next sprint.
How you'll know it's working
What this replaces
The other ways teams handle this today, and how the Starch version compares.
One platform — meeting notes, knowledge management, project management all running on connected data. Setup in plain English; numbers stay current via scheduled syncs and live agent queries.
Try it on Starch →Frequently asked questions
We use Jira Service Management, not Jira Software — does Starch still pull our tickets?
What if our retro is just a Slack huddle, not a formal video call?
Is our retro data stored in Starch? We have a strict data residency policy.
Can Starch pull from PagerDuty automatically, or does someone have to run the prompt manually?
We already have retro notes scattered across 18 months of Notion pages. Can Starch search those?
What happens to action items that don't get completed? Does Starch remind anyone?
Related guides for Small IT and ITOps Teams
Vendor and category spend analysis means knowing, at any point in time, where your money is actually going — which vendors are getting paid, how much, how often, and whether that number is creeping up or down relative to last month.
Read guide →A customer knowledge base is the document — or collection of documents — that answers the questions your customers ask repeatedly.
Read guide →SOC 2 evidence collection is the part of an audit where you prove that your controls actually work — not just that they're written down somewhere.
Read guide →A Slack announcement sounds simple — you're just telling your team something.
Read guide →Run a Team Retrospective for other operators
The AI stack built for the founder's office.
Read guide →The AI stack built for small RevOps teams.
Read guide →The AI stack built for small marketing teams.
Read guide →The AI stack built for small customer success teams.
Read guide →Ready to run run a team retrospective on Starch?
Request closed-beta access. Everything is free during beta.