Sales & CRM

How to qualify inbound leads as Small Law and Accounting Practices

Sales & CRMFor Small Law and Accounting Practices2 apps12 steps~24 min to set up

A new matter inquiry lands in Outlook. Someone prints the intake form and puts it on the right person's desk. A paralegal manually checks the conflict spreadsheet. Two days later the prospective client hasn't heard back, and nobody remembers whether a conflicts check was actually run. At a four-CPA practice, a prospective client emails about tax planning; that email gets forwarded three times before anyone qualifies whether they're a fit for your firm. You're losing good clients to slow response times and losing partner hours to intake conversations with people who were never going to hire you. Clio and QuickBooks don't solve this — Clio manages active matters, not the funnel that fills them.

Build this on Starch → See the apps used

Sales & CRMFor Small Law and Accounting Practices2 apps12 steps~24 min to set up

Outcome

What you'll set up

An intake triage app that reads every new inquiry from Outlook or Gmail, scores the lead against your firm's criteria (practice area, matter size, conflict status), and surfaces only the ones worth a partner's time

A custom CRM with fields that map to how law and accounting firms actually work — matter type, estimated engagement value, referral source, conflict-check status, retainer amount — not a generic sales pipeline

An automated follow-up sequence that drafts a tailored acknowledgment email within minutes of intake and flags any lead that goes 48 hours without a partner touchpoint

The Starch recipe

Apps, data, and prompts

The combination of Starch apps, the data sources they pull from, and the prompts you use to drive them.

Apps used

CRM Email Agent

Data sources & config

Starch connects directly to Outlook (scheduled-sync provider) so the Email Agent reads your firm's incoming messages and syncs thread history. The CRM connects to Gmail or Outlook from Starch's integration catalog for ongoing email context per matter. QuickBooks is connected as a scheduled-sync provider to pull historical client billing data when scoring a returning client's engagement value. Conflict check lookups against your Clio contacts are handled through browser automation — Starch automates Clio through your browser, no separate API setup needed.

Prompts to copy

Build me an intake CRM for a six-attorney litigation and estate planning firm. Fields I need: prospect name, contact email, matter type (dropdown: litigation, estate planning, business formation, other), estimated matter value, referral source, conflict check status (dropdown: not run, clear, flagged), assigned partner, intake date, and last contact date. Stage pipeline: New Inquiry → Conflict Check → Partner Review → Engagement Letter Sent → Retained → Declined. I want to be able to filter by matter type and flag anything in Partner Review that hasn't moved in 5 days.

Set up email triage connected to our firm's Outlook inbox. When a new intake inquiry arrives — anything that mentions 'representation,' 'consultation,' 'tax help,' 'matter,' or 'case' — summarize the request in two sentences, estimate the matter type from the content, draft a reply acknowledging receipt and offering a 20-minute intake call, and create a task to run a conflict check. Flag any inquiry where the prospect mentions an opposing party so I can check conflicts before we respond.

Run these in Starch → or paste them into your favorite agent

Walkthrough

Step-by-step

1 Connect your firm's Outlook or Gmail account as a scheduled-sync provider so Starch reads inbound messages, labels, and thread history on a continuous schedule.

2 Connect QuickBooks as a scheduled-sync provider so Starch can reference prior billing history when a known contact submits a new inquiry — useful for flagging past clients who carried a balance.

3 Start with the CRM app from the Starch App Store, then customize the schema by describing your firm's pipeline: matter types, retainer amounts, conflict-check status, assigned partner. The AI rebuilds the fields to match what your intake coordinator actually tracks.

4 Set up the Email Agent app and point it at your general intake inbox or shared firm address. Tell it what subject lines and phrases indicate a prospective client versus a vendor, court notice, or existing client update.

5 Define your lead-scoring logic in plain language: 'Flag any inquiry mentioning litigation or estate planning with an estimated matter value above $10,000 as high priority. Flag anything mentioning an opposing party for immediate conflict review before we reply.'

6 Configure draft-reply templates for each matter type. The Email Agent will use these as its drafting baseline, filling in prospect-specific details pulled from the thread before surfacing the draft for one-click review.

7 Wire the CRM and Email Agent together: every email the agent triages as a new prospect automatically creates a CRM record, pre-populated with matter type, contact info, and a conflict-check task assigned to your intake paralegal.

8 Set up a 48-hour follow-up automation: if a CRM record in 'New Inquiry' stage hasn't logged an outbound email or a stage change, Starch drafts a follow-up and puts it in your review queue with a flag. No prospect goes cold without someone deciding to let it.

9 Add a weekly digest automation: every Monday at 8 a.m., Starch pulls all open intake records, shows you what moved last week (new inquiries, conflict checks completed, retainers signed), and surfaces anything stuck in Partner Review more than five days.

10 For Clio conflict checks, tell Starch: 'When a new inquiry is created in the CRM, open Clio, search the opposing party name and the prospective client name against our contacts database, and log the result in the conflict-check status field.' Starch handles this through browser automation — no Clio API key required.

11 Once a prospect is retained, use the CRM to log the engagement letter date, retainer amount pulled from your intake notes, and responsible partner. This becomes your audit trail if a client ever disputes the intake timeline.

12 Review and refine the scoring logic after the first two weeks: open the CRM, ask 'show me every lead we declined in the last 30 days and why,' and adjust your intake criteria prompt based on what you see.

See this running on Starch

Connect your tools, describe what you want, and the agent builds it. Closed beta is free.

Try it on Starch →

Worked example

February 2026 intake week — estate planning and business formation mix

Sample numbers from a real run

New estate planning inquiries received	11
Inquiries auto-triaged as low priority (vendor, existing client, court notices)	4
Flagged for conflict check before response	2
Partner-review-ready leads surfaced	7
Draft acknowledgment emails reviewed and sent within 2 hours	7
Retainers signed by end of week	3
Estimated retainer value for the week	24,500

On a Tuesday morning, seven intake emails arrived through the firm's general Outlook address. The Email Agent read each thread, identified four as genuine prospective matters (three estate planning, one business formation), flagged one because the prospect mentioned an opposing party in a potential dispute matter — triggering a conflict-check task in the CRM before anyone drafted a reply — and classified two as existing client questions routed to the responsible partner's queue. For the four new prospects, the agent drafted acknowledgment emails referencing the specific matter type each had described, proposed two intake call times based on the assigned partner's Google Calendar availability, and created CRM records pre-populated with matter type, estimated engagement tier, and a conflict-check status of 'not run.' By 10 a.m., the paralegal had reviewed and sent all four drafts, run two conflict checks in Clio through browser automation, and logged results back to the CRM. By end of week, three of the seven qualified leads had signed engagement letters totaling $24,500 in retainers. None of it required printing a form or forwarding an email chain.

Measurement

How you'll know it's working

Intake-to-response time: hours from first inquiry email to acknowledgment sent (target under 4 hours)

Conflict-check completion rate: percentage of new inquiries with a logged conflict-check result before partner review

Lead-to-retainer conversion rate: qualified prospects who sign an engagement letter within 14 days of inquiry

Partner hours spent on intake per matter retained: time from first contact to signed engagement letter

Inquiry-to-decline ratio by matter type: which matter types your firm most often declines, to refine intake filtering

Comparison

What this replaces

The other ways teams handle this today, and how the Starch version compares.

Clio Grow

Clio Grow handles intake forms and e-signatures well, but it doesn't draft acknowledgment emails, score leads against your criteria, or connect your intake pipeline to QuickBooks billing history — you're still coordinating across tools manually.

Karbon (for accounting practices)

Karbon is strong for workflow management on active engagements, but it's not built for top-of-funnel lead qualification or email triage on prospective clients before they become a client record.

HubSpot + Zapier

HubSpot can model a lead pipeline and Zapier can route emails, but you're configuring two paid platforms, maintaining Zap logic when fields change, and still writing your own intake drafts — the setup cost is high for a six-attorney firm.

Spreadsheet + Outlook rules + paralegal

This is what most small practices actually use; it works until the paralegal is out sick or the spreadsheet has three versions and nobody knows which is current — there's no audit trail and response time depends entirely on who's checking email.

MyCase

MyCase covers intake forms and client portal well, but its CRM schema is fixed — you can't add a 'conflict-check status' field or a 'referral source tier' without workarounds, and it doesn't draft emails or score lead quality.

On Starch RECOMMENDED

One platform — crm, email agent all running on connected data. Setup in plain English; numbers stay current via scheduled syncs and live agent queries.

Try it on Starch →

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

We use Clio as our practice management system. Does Starch connect to it?

Starch automates Clio through your browser — no separate API setup needed. You can tell Starch to search for conflict check results in Clio, pull a matter number, or log intake notes, and it navigates Clio the same way your paralegal would. It's not a scheduled sync the way Outlook or QuickBooks are, but for tasks like conflict lookups it works reliably.

Is Starch SOC 2 Type II certified? We handle sensitive client information.

Not yet — Starch is not currently SOC 2 Type II certified. That's worth knowing before you decide how much client intake data flows through it. Some firms use Starch for intake scoring and lead qualification while keeping matter-specific documents in Clio or a dedicated DMS. We'd rather you know the limit upfront.

What if our intake emails come from a shared firm address that three attorneys check?

Starch connects to a shared Outlook or Gmail inbox and reads it as a single source. You can tell the Email Agent to assign triage tasks to specific people based on matter type — estate planning inquiries route to one partner's queue, business formation to another — so the shared inbox stops being a place where things get missed.

Can Starch actually run a conflict check, or does it just remind someone to do it?

Both, depending on how you configure it. At minimum, it creates a conflict-check task and flags the CRM record. If you want it to actually navigate Clio and search for the opposing party and prospective client name, it can do that through browser automation and log the result back to the CRM record. You review the result before any reply goes out.

We're a four-CPA practice, not a law firm. Does this still apply to us?

Yes — the workflow is the same. New prospect emails an inquiry about tax planning or CFO services, it lands in Outlook, and without a system it gets forwarded until someone handles it. Starch can triage those inquiries, score them against your service lines (individual tax, business tax, advisory), draft an acknowledgment, and create a CRM record with the right fields for an accounting practice — service type, estimated annual fee, referral source, conflict check. The CRM schema is fully customizable.

What happens to leads that don't convert? Do they stay in the CRM forever?

You decide. You can tell Starch to archive declined records after 90 days, keep them with a 'declined' stage for referral tracking, or delete them. You can also ask the CRM at any point: 'show me every lead we declined in the last six months and the reason we logged' — useful if you want to refine your intake criteria or identify patterns in who's not a fit.

Does Starch store my Outlook emails or QuickBooks data on its servers?

For scheduled-sync providers like Outlook and QuickBooks, Starch syncs the data to its database and refreshes it on a schedule — that's what powers the real-time queries in your apps. Starch does not currently offer an on-premises or self-hosted option. If your firm has strict data residency requirements, that's worth discussing before you connect sensitive financial or client data.