How to plan trade spend and retail promotions on Starch
Trade spend is money you commit to retailers and distributors to get shelf placement, run promotions, and fund co-op advertising. For most brands selling through retail, it's one of the largest line items on the P&L — often 15–25% of gross revenue — and one of the least visible. You write the check (or absorb the deduction), the promotion runs, and weeks later you're still trying to figure out whether it moved product or just moved money.
What this looks like in practice varies: a brand running quarterly resets at a national grocery chain has a different problem than one managing a fragmented network of regional brokers, but the core challenge is the same. Budget gets allocated upfront, results trickle in late, and the variance between plan and actual lives in a spreadsheet nobody fully trusts.
On Starch, the picture looks different. You get a live view of every promotion on the calendar — budget committed, deductions received, lift measured against a baseline — without waiting for your broker to send a deck or manually reconciling distributor portals. When a promotional event closes, the actual scan data comes in and sits next to the original plan. You see what it cost, what it returned, and which accounts are worth doing it again. That view exists in a dashboard you describe once and update automatically — not a spreadsheet you rebuild every quarter.
Why it matters
Untracked trade spend doesn't just hurt margins — it compounds. Retailers take deductions regardless of whether the promotion performed, so if you're not measuring lift event by event, you're funding bad promotions twice: once when you commit the budget, again when you reauthorize next cycle. Brands that close the loop between spend and sell-through data negotiate better terms, cut underperforming events, and redeploy dollars to accounts that actually move volume.
Common pitfalls
The four mistakes that show up most often: First, planning trade budgets at the account level but tracking deductions at the invoice level — the two never reconcile cleanly. Second, measuring promotional lift against the wrong baseline, usually average weekly velocity instead of pre-event velocity at that specific store. Third, treating scan-back timing as an accounting issue rather than a performance signal — late scans often mean poor execution, not slow processing. Fourth, reviewing broker activity quarterly when distribution voids and out-of-stocks happen weekly and compound fast.
Starch apps used
See this running on Starch
Connect your tools, describe what you want, and the agent builds it. Closed beta is free.
Choose your operator
A version of this guide tailored to your role — same recipe, different starting context.
Related workflows in Ops & Supply
Inventory shrinkage is the gap between what your records say you have and what's actually on the shelf, in the warehouse, or at your co-packer.
Read guide →Closing out the POS at end of night means verifying that what the register says happened actually matches what the cash drawer holds, what the card processor settled, and what the day's receipts show.
Read guide →Contractor job costing is the practice of tracking what a job actually costs — labor, materials, subcontractors, equipment — against what you estimated, and updating that number as work progresses and change orders land.
Read guide →Retailer deductions and distributor chargebacks are line items that show up on your remittance as money already taken — a short-pay for a late delivery, a promotional allowance you never agreed to, a compliance fee for a label that met spec.
Read guide →